Charlotte
Danielson’s A Framework
for Teaching
Rubric to
Assess the 12
|
Semester: |
|
Student
Name: |
|
Course
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluator’s
Name: |
|
Evaluator’s
Signature: |
|
Date: |
|
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
I:
PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component 1a:
Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy (page 64)
FEAP #8 Knowledge of Subject
Matter
FEAP #10
Planning
|
Element |
LEVEL
OF PERFORMANCE | |||
|
Not Yet
Accomplished |
Pre-professional |
Proficient |
Comments | |
|
Knowledge of
Content |
Teacher makes content
errors or does not correct content errors students
make. |
Teacher displays basic
content knowledge but cannot articulate connections with other parts of
the discipline or with other disciplines. |
Teacher displays solid
content knowledge and makes connections between the content and other
parts of the discipline and other disciplines. |
|
|
Knowledge of Prerequisite
Relationships |
Teacher displays little
understanding of prerequisite knowledge important for student learning of
the content. |
Teacher indicates some
awareness of prerequisite learning, although such knowledge may be
incomplete or inaccurate. |
Teacher’s plans and
practices reflect understanding of prerequisite relationships among topics
and concepts. | |
|
Knowledge of
Content-Related Pedagogy |
Teacher displays little
understanding of pedagogical issues involved in student learning of the
content. |
Teacher displays basic
pedagogical knowledge but does not anticipate student
misconceptions. |
Pedagogical practices
reflect current research on best pedagogical practice within the
discipline but without anticipating student
misconceptions. | |
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
I:
PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component 1b:
Demonstrating Knowledge of Students (page 67)
FEAP #1 Assessment
FEAP #5
Diversity
FEAP #7 Human
Development & Learning
FEAP #10
Planning
|
Element |
LEVEL
OF PERFORMANCE | |||
|
Not Yet
Accomplished |
Pre-professional |
Proficient |
Comments | |
|
Knowledge of
Characteristics of Age Group |
Teacher displays minimal
knowledge of developmental characteristics of age
group. |
Teacher displays
generally accurate knowledge of developmental characteristics of age
group. |
Teacher displays thorough
understanding of typical developmental characteristics of age group as
well as exceptions of general patterns. |
|
|
Knowledge of Students’
Varied Approaches to Learning |
Teacher is unfamiliar
with the different approaches to learning that students exhibit, such as
learning styles, modalities, and different
“intelligences.” |
Teacher displays general
understanding of the different approaches to learning that students
exhibit. |
Teacher displays solid
understanding of the different approaches to learning that different
students exhibit. | |
|
Knowledge of Students’
Skills and Knowledge |
Teacher displays little
knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge and does not indicate that
such knowledge is valuable. |
Teacher recognizes the
value of understanding students’ skills and knowledge but displays this
knowledge for the class only as a whole. |
Teacher displays
knowledge of students’ skills and knowledge for groups of students and
recognizes the value of this knowledge. | |
|
Knowledge of Students’
Interests and Cultural Heritage |
Teacher displays little
knowledge of students’ interests or cultural heritage and does not
indicate that such knowledge is valuable. |
Teacher recognizes the
value of understanding students’ interests or cultural heritage but
displays this knowledge for the class only as a
whole. |
Teacher displays
knowledge of the interests or cultural heritage of groups of students and
recognizes the value of this
knowledge. | |
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
I:
PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component 1c:
Selecting Instructional Goals (page 70)
FEAP #1 Assessment
FEAP #7 Human
Development & Learning
FEAP #8 Knowledge of
Subject Matter
FEAP #10
Planning
|
Element |
LEVEL
OF PERFORMANCE | |||
|
Not Yet
Accomplished |
Pre-professional |
Proficient |
Comments | |
|
Value |
Goals are not valuable
and represent low expectations or no conceptual understanding for
students. Goals do not
reflect important learning. |
Goals are moderately
valuable in either their expectations or conceptual understanding for
students and in importance of learning. |
Goals are valuable in
their level of expectations, conceptual understanding, and importance of
learning. |
|
|
Clarity |
Goals are either not
clear or are stated as student activities. Goals do not permit viable methods
of assessment. |
Goals are only moderately
clear or include a combination of goals and activities. Some goals do not permit viable
methods of assessment. |
Most of the goals are
clear but may include a few activities. Most permit viable methods of
assessment. | |
|
Suitability for Diverse
Students |
Goals are not suitable
for the class. |
Most of the goals are
suitable for most students in the class. |
All the goals are
suitable for most students in the class. | |
|
Balance |
Goals reflect only one
type of learning and one discipline or strand. |
Goals reflect several
types of learning but no effort at coordination or
integration. |
Goals reflect several
different types of learning and opportunities for
integration. | |
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
I:
PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component 1d:
Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources (page 72)
FEAP #5
Diversity
FEAP #7 Human
Development & Learning
FEAP #10
Planning
FEAP #12
Technology
|
Element |
LEVEL
OF PERFORMANCE | |||
|
Not Yet
Accomplished |
Pre-professional |
Proficient |
Comments | |
|
Resources for
Teaching |
Teacher is unaware of
resources available through the school or
district. |
Teacher displays limited
awareness of resources available through the school or
district. |
Teacher is fully aware of
all resources available through the school or
district. |
|
|
Resources for
Students |
Teacher is unaware of
resources available to assist students who need
them. |
Teacher displays limited
awareness of resources available through the school or
district. |
Teacher is fully aware of
all resources available through the school or district and knows how to
gain access for students. | |
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
I:
PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component 1e:
Designing Coherent Instruction (page 75)
FEAP #4 Critical Thinking
FEAP #5 Diversity
FEAP #7 Human
Development & Learning
FEAP #8 Knowledge of
Subject Matter
FEAP #10
Planning
FEAP #12 Technology
|
Element |
LEVEL
OF PERFORMANCE | |||
|
Not Yet
Accomplished |
Pre-professional |
Proficient |
Comments | |
|
Learning
Activities |
Not suitable to students
or instructional goals. Do
not follow an organized progression.
Do not reflect recent professional
research. |
Only some learning
activities suitable to students or instructional goals. Progression of activities is
uneven. Only some reflect
recent professional research. |
Most of the learning
activities are suitable to students and instructional goals. Progression of activities in the
unit is fairly even, and most activities reflect recent professional
research. |
|
|
Instructional Materials
and Resources |
Do not support
instructional goals. Do not
engage students in meaningful learning. |
Some support
instructional goals. Some
engage students in meaningful learning. |
All materials and
resources support the instructional goals, and most engage students in
meaningful learning. | |
|
Instructional
Groups |
Do not support
instructional goals and offer no variety. |
Groups are inconsistent
in suitability to the instructional goals and offer minimal
variety. |
Instructional groups are
varied, as appropriate to the different instructional
goals. | |
|
Lesson and Unit
Structure |
No clearly defined
structure, or the structure is chaotic. Time allocations are
unrealistic. |
Recognizable structure,
but structure is not uniformly maintained throughout. Most time allocations are
reasonable. |
The lesson or unit has a
clearly defined structure that activities are organized around. Time allocations are
reasonable. | |
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
I:
PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component 1f:
Assessing Student Learning (page 78)
FEAP #1 Assessment
FEAP #2
Communication
FEAP #7 Human
Development & Learning
FEAP #10
Planning
|
Element |
LEVEL
OF PERFORMANCE | |||
|
Not Yet
Accomplished |
Pre-professional |
Proficient |
Comments | |
|
Congruence with
Instructional Goals |
Content and methods of
assessment (the proposed approach) lack congruence with instructional
goals. |
Some instructional goals
assessed through the proposed approach, but may are
not. |
All the instructional
goals are nominally assessed through
the proposed plan, but the approach is more suitable to some goals
than to others. |
|
|
Criteria and
Standards |
The proposed approach
contains no clear criteria or standards. |
Assessment criteria and
standards are developed, but are not clear or not clearly communicated to
students. |
Assessment criteria and
standards are clear and have been clearly communicated to
students. | |
|
Use of
Planning |
Students not aware of how
they are meeting established standards and do not participate. Assessment results affect planning
for students only minimally. |
Teacher uses assessment
results to plan for the class as a whole. |
Teacher uses assessment
results to plan for individuals and groups of
students. | |
|
I have reviewed and
understand the completed evaluation.
|
|
|
|
|
Student’s
Signature |
Date |
|
Student Comments
(optional): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
Danielson’s A Framework
for Teaching
Rubric to
Assess the 12
|
Semester: |
|
Student
Name: |
|
Course
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluator’s
Name: |
|
Evaluator’s
Signature: |
|
Date: |
|
Directions: Circle the observed
Level of Performance and write additional comments to support your
evaluation. If an element was not
observed, indicate by writing “N/O” under the Comments section.
II: THE
CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
Component 2a:
Creating and Environment of Respect and Rapport (page 80) FEAP #9 Learning
Environment