Timeline/Guidelines for Annual Selection of Online Courses for Development
PROCEDURES FOR COURSE DEVELOPMENT
| PROCEDURE |
TIMELINES |
| SESSION I |
SESSION II |
SESSION III |
| Step 1. Provosts' Council identifies potential courses to be
developed, along with any other policy parameters (*), guided by the Project
Eagle grant document. |
Mid-April (for academic year) |
| Step 2. Faculty are polled about their interest in
developing courses and for suggestions regarding additional courses. |
Mid-April (for academic year) |
| Step 3. Provosts' Council considers results of poll, shares
with their respective Program Directors, and issues approved list of courses
and course developers. |
Early June (for academic year) |
| Step 4. Lynda Womer sends Addendum
to the Supplement/Adjunct Contract (Exhibit
"A") to those on approved list. Instructors sign and return
to Lynda Womer, after which she obtains President's signature and notifies
Mike Howard that Addendum... is complete. Lynda Womer sends courtesy
copy of signed Addendum... to Instructor and files original. |
Late August (for academic year) |
| Step 5. (Contemporaneously with "Step 4") Mike Howard
forwards list of approved Instructors to Instructional Technologists, by
campus. |
Late August (for academic year) |
| Step 6. Upon notification from
Lynda Womer that both Addendum... signatures have been secured,
Instructional Technologist contacts each designated Instructor and arranges
meeting. |
Early Sept. |
Mid-Jan. |
Mid-May |
| Step 7. Instructional Technologist
completes Online Course Development Agreement
(Exhibit "B") with Instructor. Mike Howard informs Lynda
of finalized list of instructors who are developing courses. |
Early Sept. |
Mid-Jan. |
Mid-May |
| Step 8. Lynda Womer completes PAR (Personnel Action
Request), inputs necessary instructor load information in Regis, forwards
PAR to VJ Dixon with dollar amount notation, and provides courtesy copy to
Jennifer Lechner. |
Early Sept. |
Mid-Jan. |
Mid-May |
| Step 9. Instructor, working with Instructional Technologist
and Instructional Technician, develops the course. |
Aug.-Nov. |
Jan.-Apr. |
May-Aug. |
| Step 10. Instructional Technologist
forwards completed Online Course Development Agreement to Lynda
Womer for signature and filing. |
2 wks prior to end of session |
2 wks prior to end of session |
2 wks prior to start of Session I |
| Step 11. Instructor completes Flexible
Access and Delivery Form (found in the Curriculum Folder on the Big
Apple) and forwards completed form to Lynda Womer. |
2 wks prior to end of session |
2 wks prior to end of session |
2 wks prior to start of Session I |
| Step 12. Lynda Womer involves
appropriate campus Program Director(s) for an informal review of the Flexible
Access and Delivery Form. Program Director makes suggestions and
Instructor revises, as necessary. |
15 days after crs. compl. |
15 days after crs. compl. |
15 days after crs. compl. |
| Step 13. With Program Director(s)' approval, Lynda Womer
inputs necessary course information in Regis, authorizes and processes
payment to Instructor for course development, and monitors enrollment, ECH,
etc. |
15 days after crs. compl. |
15 days after crs. compl. |
15 days after crs. compl. |
| Step 14. Lynda Womer forwards completed
Flexible Access and Delivery Form to Dr. Carol Copenhaver. Dr.
Copenhaver establishes committee of administrators and peers to review
form and make suggestions for improvement. While form is being reviewed,
Instructor is allowed one pilot semester to offer course and fine-tune
Flexible Access and Delivery Form before final approval or disapproval. |
30 days after crs. compl. |
30 days after crs. compl. |
30 days after crs. compl. |
* For example, the Provosts' Council has determined that in
order to develop a course for on-line delivery, a faculty member must have
taught the course twice (two different semesters) in a traditional format,
and must be fully credentialled to teach the course. Also, faculty will be
limited to developing one course per term unless substantial external
content resources exist.
|